An 'Avurudu' without Halaal!

This post is regarding a poster campaign by the so called 'Bodu Bala Sena', around Kandy forcing the people who celebrate 'Avurudu' not to have Halaal food.

First of all, I would like to wish 'Bodu Bala Sena' an advanced 'Subha Aluth Avuruddak'. And I am going to help 'Bodu Bala Sena' differentiate Halaal food from others, so it would be easier for them to refrain from consuming Halaal food even by mistake.

According to Islam, food can be classified as either Halaal, Haraam or Makruh. Since, 'Bodu Bala Sena' knows more about Halaal than Muslims themselves, let's see the other categories of foods.

Haraam
'Bodu Bala Sena' say that they do not want Halaal, which means, they are more interested in Haraam. The Arabic term 'Haraam' means 'sinful'. According to Islam, Haraam food involves the following.

• Meat from swine.
• Pork based products and by-products.
• Human flesh.
• Animals improperly slaughtered.
• Animals already dead before slaughtering is due to take place (except for fish).
• Animals killed or sacrificed in the name of others than Allah.
• Intoxicants.
• Carnivorous animals (e.g. cat, lion, tiger, fox,dog).
• Birds of prey (e.g. vulture, eagle, owl).
• Land animals without external ears (e.g. snake, reptiles, worms, insects).
• Animals that have been ordered the killing of (e.g. gecko, scorpion).
• Animals which are forbidden to kill (e.g. bee, frog).
• Blood and blood by-products.
• Urine, faeces, phlegm, pus and other nasty fluids.
• Poisonous and narcotic products.
• Food contaminated with any of the above mentioned products.

Makruh

They can consider on Makruh as well. The Arabic term 'Makruh' means 'detested' i.e. which are disliked by Allah but not Haraam. Muslims are advised that it's better to avoid such food (e.g. horse).

Hence, my dear friends of 'Bodu Bala Sena', are you sure that you are going to consume any of the above foods for 'Avurudu'? If you are to avoid Halaal, it effectively means that you should consume the above mentioned things. I don't think that it is a very good idea. Am I right?

Further, I am sure that 'Kiribath', 'Kavum', 'Kokis', 'Aasmi', 'Pani Valalu' and all the other yummy 'Avurudu' cuisine does not include any of the above mentioned Haraam contaminated in it. If those yummy 'Avurudu Kama' does not include, Haraam contaminated products, isn't it Halaal? Hence, my dear friends of 'Bodu Bala Sena',

Do you still think that you have won the battle against Halaal?

I think not!

"Therefore, eat of what Allah has provided for you (which is) lawful and good. And be grateful for the favor of Allah, if it is (indeed) Him that you worship."

The Glorious Quran- Surah An-Nahl (The Bee). Chapter 16. Verse 114.

Attacks against Muslims in the year 2013!

This post is regarding the attacks against Muslims in Sri Lanka for the past 3 months. The attacks are listed below according to the date which it happened. 

05th January 2013
A protest demanding to vacate the mosque located in Malwathu Oya Lane, Anuradhapura. Protest was led by some Buddhist monks.


09th January 2013
The above mentioned mosque was vandalized by an unknown group.

17th February 2013

'Bodu Maha Samuluwa' meeting was held in the city of Maharagama targeting Halaal. The meeting was organized by 'Bodu Bala Sena'.

On the same day, a meeting about Halaal Awareness was organized by 'All Ceylon Tawheed Jama'ath' in Kattankudi. It was ceased by Police prior commencement.

27th February 2013
A group of Muslim girls wearing Islamic attire were attacked and forced to remove their veils in Dickwella, Matara.

28th February 2013
The Jummah Masjid in Kegalle town was attacked i.e. stoned by unknown individuals.

01st March 2013

A slaughterhouse in Dematagoda which was ran by Colombo Municipal Council was raided by 'Bodu Bala Sena' and some policemen claiming that it has not been licensed or approved.

Police announced on 06th March 2013 that this was a false claim. [Source: apennews.com]

03rd March 2013

Muslim students of Wekada Bauddhaloka Maha Vidyalaya, Eluwila, Panadura were forced by the principal of the school to bow to their teachers and touch the feet.

On the same day, Anti-Halaal posters were there to be seen in the towns of Beruwala and Aluthgama.

4th March 2013

Mahara prison mosque, which is older than 60 years was vandalized by an unknown group.

On the same day, another mosque located in Opanayake, Balangoda was stoned by an unknown group.

කවුද මේවට වග කියන්නේ? 

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? 

Sri Lankans would surely know that who arose and encouraged such malicious activities. They announced that 'Bodu Bala Sena' means 'Buddhist Strength Force'. But now they have proven that it means, 'Anti-Muslim Force'.

What's the problem now?

My dear friends of 'Bodu Bala Sena'!

As per your request, the Halaal logo will not appear in the products which are distributed in Sri Lanka. This was a decision made considering The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama (ACJU), Chamber of Commerce as well as some venerable Buddhist priests. However, the companies MAY use this logo for the purpose of exporting their products for countries which they think this logo would be helpful.

This is what you as Buddhist Strength Force, requested. You wanted the Sinhalese Buddhists of Sri Lanka to boycott this logo and Halaal certified products.

Now what you say is that, by only removing the logo in Sri Lanka and continuing to practice the system of production and placing the logo for export purposes is not right. Well my dear friends, now you cannot point your hands to ACJU. Because, it is clearly up to the companies to decide whether to focus on the market in Sri Lanka or overseas. If they want to expand their market to foreign countries (Middle Eastern countries, to be more precise), this logo would add more value. 

You have further said that Muslims transfer funds to terrorist organisations and support them. If what you have said is the truth, Muslims would have acted violently regarding this issue. There were posters all around the country against Muslims, death threats for Muslims, strict warnings to vacate their businesses in certain urban areas of the country and so on. But, did you ever see any violence by Muslims against you or any other Buddhists regarding this issue? The answer would be 'No'. The Muslims still consider Buddhists as their brothers. How can you call them terrorists and blame that they support terrorism, when they behave in a manner which is completely against terrorism?

I do not understand what is your problem brothers. 

Please behave in a manner which Buddha has taught you. 

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."- Buddha.

Gonibillo- Galgoda Atthe Gnanasara Thero!

My dear Gnanasara Thero!

I heard you talking (blasting actually) on various occasions and was able to pick out a word you are very fond of using. A word you use to refer to Muslim women. 'Gonibillo', which is a word used by mothers to scare their children when feeding them. I do not know what similarity has Gnanasara Thero found with Gonibillo and Muslim women. Oh! He may have been deceived by their dress (But aren't monks not supposed to look at women?).

He might not be having the proper knowledge or understanding why Muslim women wear clothes covering the whole body. It is a duty of us to make him aware. (But it arises another question, why should a monk care if a woman covers her body or not? Does he want the women to take off their veils because he wants to look at women? I do not think so. Am I right, Gnanasara Thero?)

Gnanasara Thero, it is not appropriate to ask you this question since you are a monk. But you made me ask this from you. Will you get attracted and look at a girl who is revealing herself or a girl who is covering herself? It is obvious that revealing drags more attention and attraction, especially in the case of a woman. Any man would like to have a second look at a woman who reveals herself, which may lead to serious crimes such as sexual harassment. Islam, therefore as a precautionary measure, wants the Muslim women to cover themselves.

And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc.) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like palms of hands or one eye or both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer dress like veil, gloves, head-cover, apron, etc.), and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms, etc.) and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's fathers, their sons, their husband's sons, their brothers or their brother's sons, or their sister's sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e. their sisters in Islam), or the (female) slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who lack vigor  or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And all of you beg Allah to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful.- The Glorious Qur'an- Surah An-Noor. Chapter 24. Verse 31.

Hence Gnanasara Thero, it is the duty of a Muslim woman to cover herself since it has been ordered by Allah. And as Sri Lankans, I hope that Muslims do have their religious rights, which means they have the total right to practice their own religion. If a Muslim woman is to practice her religion completely, she should cover herself. 

Ask yourself whether is it appropriate to call a woman who practices her religion and wants no men to witness her beauty, a gonibilla?

Finally Gnanasara Thero, I post this picture to make you understand what I mean if you are still not clear.

I know that you did not have an idea on why these women wear clothes that are totally covered and unattractive. And now I hope that in the future you will not use such terms to address women who are trying to protect themselves from the gaze of men.

Can you have religious co-existence in Saudi Arabia?- Madagoda Abayatissa

Hello Madagoda Abayatissa Thero!

This post is regarding your statement "Can you have religious co-existence in Saudi Arabia? So religious-coexistence is a ruse to destroy Buddhism."

In this case, I do not agree with you and I do not understand the reason why you are connecting Sri Lanka with Saudi Arabia. There are 2 particular facts that you need to consider in the issue of such a statement.

1. If you are not aware of  the full name of Saudi Arabia; it is 'Kingdom of Saudi Arabia'. A Kingdom is a nation ruled by a king, in the case of Saudi Arabia it is 'Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud' who serves the country as the king. In a Kingdom, you are not supposed to speak or act against the king, for which you can be penalized. That is the norm of a Kingdom. Hence, it is obvious that, why there is no religious co-existence in Saudi Arabia.

The full name of Sri Lanka on the other hand is, 'Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka'. A Democracy is a nation ruled by the whole population. In a democratic country you have the complete freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of press, etc. Therefore, it is normal that in a country such as Sri Lanka, there is religious freedom. Even a five year old may understand this. But, it is very pathetic that a man such as you have not understood the logic behind this.

2. According to the facts I obtained from the following websites,                                          
          (i) http://www.whn.org/content/Saudi.htm
          (ii) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Saudi_Arabia
it is clear that there is less than 1% of followers of other religions reside in Saudi Arabia. And almost all of them were migrants from other countries. In a country such as this, is it necessary to have religious co-existence. Please elaborate on this, Abayatissa Thero.

According to the facts I obtained from the following websites,

          (i) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Sri_Lanka
          (ii) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Sri_Lanka
it is obvious the followers of Buddhism amounts to 70% of the population of the country while the other 30% are followers of Hinduism (12.6%), followers of Islam (9.7%) and followers of Christianity (7.4%). Hence Mr Abayatissa, is it fair to compare the two countries? 

When we talk about the rights of 30% of the population of Sri Lanka, you are pointing your hand towards a country which has LESS THAN 1% population of minorities which is also with a totally different system of control.

Is it fair? Ask yourself.
Be wise and think twice before publishing statements such as this. Because, we admire Buddhism, Buddhists and Buddha. People such as you and your good friend Gnanasara Thero are humiliating Buddhism in the name of 'Bodu Bala Sena'.

The Dawn

I've been looking forward to start writing a blog since a very long time. The only issue that I had to face was a topic or theme for my blog. According to the current circumstance that prevails in the country, I thought that it would be most appropriate if I start replying to Buddhist Strength Force or to be more precise 'Bodu Bala Sena' and Galgoda Atthe Gnanasara Thero.

The reason for me to choose this topic goes back to my childhood. Being raised on a village with a majority of Buddhists, I know the value of Buddhism, Buddhists and Buddha himself. Hence I have a high respect for Buddhism in my mind. That is what my religion has also taught me.

I've seen, from the days I was a toddler, how Buddhist monks behave, speak and act. I do not see any of such qualities in Gnanasara Thero. Hence, if I address him as 'venerable', it is a great insult for other venerable, admirable, kindhearted Buddhist priests whom I came across since my childhood, who serve Buddhism and the country with their knowledge and wisdom.

I urge all my Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim and Burgher friends to read my blog and feel free to share your valuable comments with me.